The canonical 3PL Compare schema. Verified providers appear in our pricing index and audit reports. No commitment until a brand requests an introduction.
Pre-filled from your registered profile. Update if needed.
Enter your tiered structure. Per-pick rates only — no bundled flat fees. Brand will see all tiers in the comparison view.
If you only price flat-rate, leave the additional column at $0 and put your effective per-order rate in the first-pick column. Tiered always wins for the brand.
Pricing model + base rate + long-term storage trigger. Brand needs all three.
LTS = long-term storage. Stating this upfront builds trust — brands flag undisclosed LTS as a risk in the comparison view.
Critical — this is where comparisons fall apart. Be precise.
Pass-through is the brand's preferred model. Cost-plus typically loses on price comparisons. State your model clearly — undisclosed markup is the #1 dispute cause.
List every recurring or trigger-based fee. Anything missing here is treated as $0 by the comparison engine — and surfaces as a risk flag if discovered later.
Brands surface these as risk flags in the decision matrix. Honest terms convert better than buried ones.
Native = direct API. Bridge = via 3rd-party iPaaS. CSV = manual.
Optional but helpful. Brand sees these as downloadable attachments in the comparison view.